If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.Īs a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads, book reviews, and insider interviews Big Picture topical collections Say More contributor interviews Opinion Has It podcast features The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. At a time of unprecedented uncertainty, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.īut there is no doubt that we, like so many other media organizations nowadays, are under growing strain. Against this background, the notion that force alone can transform conflict-riven societies in the Middle East and elsewhere is a dangerous fallacy.įor more than 25 years, Project Syndicate has been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world's foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. As outgoing US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel pointed out in a recent interview, in war, “things can get out of control, and drift and wander” in ways that can cause a military to fall into a more “accelerated” use of force than was initially anticipated. After the Vietnam War, for example, the United States’ armed forces suppressed what it had learned about counter-insurgency, only to rediscover it the hard way in Iraq and Afghanistan.Īmerica’s military interventions in these countries exemplify another key challenge of modern warfare. Governments have a very poor track record when it comes to answering this question. The issue we addressed is a critical one: What kind of war should militaries today be preparing to fight?
MUNICH – At the World Economic Forum’s recent annual meeting in Davos, I participated in a panel of defense leaders to discuss the future of the military.
0 kommentar(er)
